Once again, Adam, you manage to be amusing and good-natured despite dramatically missing the mark. I brought up your two items on Monday among numerous others, including…
…Akihisa Ikeda’s vampires, who are immeasurably strong and the leading forces on BOTH sides of the argument for/against monster-human coexistence.
…Yuna Kagesaki’s vampires, who are willing to quietly isolate themselves from humans without significant interference and limit their conflicts to their own kind and those who actively pursue their own kind.
…Hel’s army of vampires, who are able and willing to interfere with the fate of an entire WORLD (maybe I should have waited until I was the tenth comment again before dropping that one).
And as the Japanese invented everything the Swiss didn’t, Vampires are a true Japanese invention. So they’re perfect role models for all those vampires out there?
I seem to be missing your point.
I have to assume so, given that I have no idea what you’re talking about. I was merely bringing up those vampires with whom I was familiar to raise the point that there are a lot more role-model vampires on both sides of the morality spectrum than the ones Adam brought up.
And as I pointed out, I am aware that Adam is making his points in good fun. I simply deign to bring up those vampires of which he appears to be unaware in the hopes of offering him new venues of entertainment.
Besides which, taking the absurd at face value is all part of the fun in this community.
No mention of the breakfast cereal flogging monstrosity?
A creature with a face only a mother could love, yet not quite as grotesque as a Nosferatu.
How about the Manananggal or the just as horrific Penanggalan.
Or the more familiar Chonchon which was portrayed in Castlevania.
Then there are the ones with no know way of getting rid of permanently like the Brahmaparusha or Churel. Just-run-away.
Anyone who identifies themselves by their species and then takes remarks about that species personally is quite simply asking for trouble. At least James Not-A-Zombie Jameson knows enough to take Adam’s zombie comics in good fun.
And you don’t even mention The Count, despite having such an adorable drawing of him in Panel 1?
ONE! That’s ONE bug! Ah ah ah ah!
TWO! That’s TWO bugs! Ah ah ah ah!
I don’t know about you, but I wouldn’t consider my elementary math teacher to be a role model. Especially not one who takes fifty seconds to count to ten.
A fang is a long, pointed tooth. In mammals, a fang is a modified maxillary tooth, used for biting and tearing flesh. In snakes, it is a specialized tooth that is associated with a venom gland (see snake venom). Spiders also have external fangs, which are part of the chelicerae.
Vampire bats have razor sharp incisors to pierce the flesh and then proceed to lick any up-welling circulatory fluids.
In Vampires of the classic eastern european variety they are specialized teeth for piecing veins or arteries to facilitate the extrication of circulatory fluid in the most expeditious manner. The are more likely either hollow or grooved to facilitate such.
Once again, Adam, you manage to be amusing and good-natured despite dramatically missing the mark. I brought up your two items on Monday among numerous others, including…
…Akihisa Ikeda’s vampires, who are immeasurably strong and the leading forces on BOTH sides of the argument for/against monster-human coexistence.
…Yuna Kagesaki’s vampires, who are willing to quietly isolate themselves from humans without significant interference and limit their conflicts to their own kind and those who actively pursue their own kind.
…Hel’s army of vampires, who are able and willing to interfere with the fate of an entire WORLD (maybe I should have waited until I was the tenth comment again before dropping that one).
And as the Japanese invented everything the Swiss didn’t, Vampires are a true Japanese invention. So they’re perfect role models for all those vampires out there?
I seem to be missing your point.
I have to assume so, given that I have no idea what you’re talking about. I was merely bringing up those vampires with whom I was familiar to raise the point that there are a lot more role-model vampires on both sides of the morality spectrum than the ones Adam brought up.
You guys know this is a joke right? To laugh. At vampires.
hahahaha!
See? Not so hard.
And as I pointed out, I am aware that Adam is making his points in good fun. I simply deign to bring up those vampires of which he appears to be unaware in the hopes of offering him new venues of entertainment.
Besides which, taking the absurd at face value is all part of the fun in this community.
No mention of the breakfast cereal flogging monstrosity?
A creature with a face only a mother could love, yet not quite as grotesque as a Nosferatu.
How about the Manananggal or the just as horrific Penanggalan.
Or the more familiar Chonchon which was portrayed in Castlevania.
Then there are the ones with no know way of getting rid of permanently like the Brahmaparusha or Churel. Just-run-away.
Adam, again?! You are killing me.
Monday’s comic being labelled “Part 1” didn’t clue you in that this was gonna happen all week?
Anyone who identifies themselves by their species and then takes remarks about that species personally is quite simply asking for trouble. At least James Not-A-Zombie Jameson knows enough to take Adam’s zombie comics in good fun.
I was feigning insult. My comments were intended to be tongue in cheek.
And you don’t even mention The Count, despite having such an adorable drawing of him in Panel 1?
ONE! That’s ONE bug! Ah ah ah ah!
TWO! That’s TWO bugs! Ah ah ah ah!
(And yes, I know the Count himself is based on Dracula, but he is NOT Dracula.)
I don’t know about you, but I wouldn’t consider my elementary math teacher to be a role model. Especially not one who takes fifty seconds to count to ten.
BREAKING NEWS: Webcomic Artist Gets Canceled On Social Media After Tooth-Shaming Nosferatu
Fang shaming, not tooth shaming.
Question: When does a tooth become a fang?
A fang is a long, pointed tooth. In mammals, a fang is a modified maxillary tooth, used for biting and tearing flesh. In snakes, it is a specialized tooth that is associated with a venom gland (see snake venom). Spiders also have external fangs, which are part of the chelicerae.
Vampire bats have razor sharp incisors to pierce the flesh and then proceed to lick any up-welling circulatory fluids.
In Vampires of the classic eastern european variety they are specialized teeth for piecing veins or arteries to facilitate the extrication of circulatory fluid in the most expeditious manner. The are more likely either hollow or grooved to facilitate such.